UK milk production, its decline and the influence of government policy.
The purpose of this web site is to illustrate the differences between milk production in England, Wales and Scotland and report the
most likely reasons why these differences have occurred. Emphasis is put on what has happened in the ten years since 2000/01.
Fig 1 shows annual milk production in the UK for each financial year from 1994/95.
This data is tabulated in Ref 1
and was downloaded from the Rural Payments
Agency web site.
Fig 2 breaks down the above production by country. Prior to super levies being
last imposed in 2003/04 (as of Sep 2011), production closely followed quota. In Fig 2, this quota data is plotted up to 2001/02 and shows
data taken from Ref 2
A computer manager at the Rural Payments Agency gave the following explanation for why production followed quota during these years.
This extract was taken from an email response.
For the years prior to 2005, the threat of a levy meant that on the whole, producers were reluctant to exceed their quota
by very much. That reluctance translated into a willingness to pay to lease in extra quota, which meant that those with spare quota
found it worthwhile to lease out. These two factors combined to ensure that the quota was distributed more or less in the same places
as the production. It is possible, therefore, to produce an approximate map of where the production was in the years before 2005,
by reference to the distribution of the quota at the end of each quota year.
A more detailed explanation is given in Ref 20
Data shown in Fig 2 from 2004/05 onwards
based on actual monitored production. These monitored production levels were taken from
Levels for the years 2002/03 and 2003/04 were taken from the quota share emailed to me separately by the RPA
in Reference 9. According to the covering email, Reference 9 shows the percentage shares of the UK net quota for each of the home countries
for the years from 1994/95 to 2010/11. These percentages need to be applied to the total UK production for each year in order to get
the volume of milk produced by each country.
Data from the three data sources described above are plotted in Figs 2 and 3 and all such data were sourced directly from
the Rural Payments Agency either through a personal email or from downloads from their web site.
Regarding trends, production in Northern Ireland has steadily increased
and its share has increased by almost 5% from about 10% to about 15%. This is at the expense of the share supplied by England which has dropped
by more than 5%. The share provided by Wales and Scotland have both steadily increased.
Fig 3 shows how production has changed since 1994/95. Not only has Northern Ireland seen greater increase in its productivity than
Great Britain and this is clearly evident from the start in 1994/95 but there is another clear trend. In about 2000/01 productivity in Wales and
Scotland started to increase over that in England when England's productivity started to go into more rapid decline. This is consistent
with the divergence in cattle numbers illustrated in Reference 5
from 2000/01 onwards. This
diverging situation in both milk production and cattle numbers has steadily increased since 2001.
Why has Northern Ireland's share increased substantially since 1994? Also, what caused England's productivity to go into more rapid decline
from about 2000/01?
Figs 4 to 7 show data from the same datasets as used for the above graphs except for the data received by email in Reference 9. Data
shown in Reference 9 contained no county breakdown so is not shown. The figures show the volume of milk produced in the top 5 producing counties in each country. In 2001,
the county in England most affected by Foot and Mouth was Cumbria where 209,106 cattle were slaughtered. The second most badly affected county was Devon
where 67,677 cattle were slaughtered. These numbers were taken from Ref 4
Indeed it can be seen that Cumbria's milk production fell considerably in 2002/03. However Cumbria's milk production strongly increased in further
years and shows the biggest increase from start to finish out of all the top 5 producing
counties. This indicates that counties which suffered big losses due to Foot and Mouth may not have seen overall reductions in milk
production and may in fact have benefited. Also Devon has seen a significant increase in its milk production since 1994/95. This goes against the overall trend in England.
Increased milk production in Devon is rather surprising because Devon is a county which is badly affected by bovine tuberculosis.
What are the overriding drivers which controlled milk production levels in the UK which may explain the trends shown in
these graphs? The sections below give some background and perhaps some answers.
In 2000 (when dairy farm income in Great Britain was extremely low) agriculture accounted for 2.4% of economic output in Northern Ireland, compared to 1% in the United Kingdom
as a whole. As in the rest of the United Kingdom, livestock and dairy account for the majority of agricultural output.
More than 80% of Northern Ireland milk and milk products are exported to over 100 countries, including Great Britain,
Europe and many countries outside the European Union. This is in stark contrast to Great Britain which is a net importer
of dairy products. Consequently the dairy industries in Northern Ireland and Great Britain operate in different markets
so will be subject to different pressures.
Compensation payments for stock lost due to Foot and Mouth in 2001 were too generous.6
Farmers were able to
use these payments to increase the number of their cattle.
This probably explains why milk
production in counties such as Cumbria, Devon and Dumfries, where many cattle were slaughtered,4
increased after 2000/01.
In the financial years between 1994/95 and 1999/00, there were a succession of years when milk quota was breached and farmers were
penalised heavily for over production. In England quotas were last exceeded in 2003/04 (as of Sep 2011). In theory this should have hit Welsh and
Scottish producers as hard as it hit English producers. It is possible however that certain countries in the UK shouldered some
of this levy. Quota payment however is an area which is currently unknown to the author as the Rural Payments Agency were unable
to provide this information when first requested. Further follow-up queries are planned.
Anthony Blair in 2001 commissioned the Sir Donald Curry report titled "Farming and Food, a sustainable
future" which advocated moving subsidy from production to the environment.8
Margaret Beckett was Secretary of State for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs between 2001 and 2006. It was during these years
that the divergence between milk production in England and milk production in Wales and Scotland occurred. During these years Margaret Beckett
fought strongly to reduce subsidy payments to farmers who wanted to produce and this may have impacted on farmer confidence and moral and
by farmers in England to cease production. As was pointed out in Reference 7,
the Common Agricultural Policy reform which was sanctioned in February 2004 allowed Scottish and Welsh farmers, who were under different jurisdiction
to farmers in England, to enjoy the support
payments, as did many others in the single European Market. However English farmers were under the jurisdiction of Margaret Beckett and did
not have this support.
This drive to reduce production-based subsidy in England is likely to have contributed to the disparity between English production and production in Wales
and Scotland shown in the above graphs. This is further examined in the following sections.
In view of the commitment, investment and extent of non-returnable asset which goes into setting up a running farm, farmers usually do not quit
before retirement age unless they are given no choice such as when they hit financial difficulties. From year to year, farm income is subject to changes
including milk price received, subsidy received from the government and super levy which has to be paid by farmers when milk quota is breached. In order to identify why
more farmers ceased production in England than in Scotland and Wales from 2001 onwards, differences in these ingoings and outgoings need to be
Regarding average milk price received in England, Wales and Scotland, these are shown in the graph below (Reference 11) where prices received by farmers
in Scotland can be compared with prices received by farmers in England and Wales.
Evidently prices received by Scottish farmers closely match those received by farmers in England and Wales. This is strong indication
that received milk price is not the reason for why milk production is reducing in England and not in Scotland. Since the price is averaged
in England and Wales and there is much more milk produced in England than in Wales, the England and Wales prices should closely follow those
being received in England.
Consumers now buy most of their milk from supermarkets. Any squeeze applied by supermarkets initially goes to
processors who then set prices received by producers. The equality of milk prices received by farmers would suggest that the influence
of supermarkets on the financial return to farmers is not significantly different in England to what it is in Scotland.
Regarding government policy and financial aid, Reference 10, which came out in December 2000, compares policy in each country and
states the following.
The set of three Rural White Papers
published for England, Scotland and Wales in 1995/96, though common in many respects,
showed notable differences in the relative priority accorded to economic or community
development and to environmental protection. The Scottish and Welsh White Papers were
more preoccupied with the question of how to sustain rural communities and ensure their
cultural and economic vitality, whereas the English document discussed the countryside
more through the need to reconcile economic and environmental objectives.
recently, differences in emphasis have been reflected in the Rural Development Plans for
England, Scotland and Wales. The English Plan is geared more towards agri-environment,
than the others, while spending on Less Favoured Area (LFA) aid is more significant in
Scotland and Wales. For example, the proposed allocation of spending on agri-environment
measures accounts for around 20% in Scotland, 35% in Wales and 60% in England, while
proposed spending on LFA aid comprises 40%, 40% and 18% respectively.
Evidently government policies in Scotland and Wales are a lot more geared towards supporting production.
Dependence on subsidy
Reference 14, which looked at the situation in 2003, describes the Single Farm Payment scheme for different countries in the UK as follows
The SFP will be implemented on a different basis in England, Wales and
Scotland. In Wales and Scotland the SFP will be based on an historic basis,
meaning that farmers will paid on what subsidy they received during 2000-
2002 and how much quota they hold on the 31/3/2005. In England the SFP
will be paid on a predominantly historic basis initially, but will be increasingly
based on the amount of land farmed in 2005, until the payments are entirely
based on land rather than historic receipts.
In England, a well-run, average-size, dairy farm currently receives about £18,000 per month for selling milk and a Single
Farm Payment of
about £15,000. The selling of cull cows and calves in the last 12 months would have brought in about another £25,000.
The Single Farm Payment
in England was set up in 2005 so that subsidy was 100% based on production from 2000 to 2002. This proportion each year
has slid from
being production based to area based. The payment is now based on about 15 to 20% production. This
current proportion gives the £15,000 payment referred to above.
This report was written in 2011 and payments in 2012 will have no
and the description of the payment of the SFP described above, it can be seen that in Scotland
and Wales, for an intensively run type of farm, which a dairy farm is, the payment
is a lot more generous and represents a substantial part of the annual income.
It should be noted that this may not give a complete picture
because dairy farmers in member states also receive financial support from the EU for projects outside the Single Farm Payment.
Farm type winners and losers
Dairying is an intensive way of farming. Beef, sheep and arable are less intensive and more dependent on area. The following table shows the
proportions by which farm types have changed in each country in the UK between 2000 and 2008. The quoted percentages have been taken
from Reference 12.
|Dairy cow numbers||England||-24%|
|Beef cow numbers||England||-4%|
It would appear from the above table that in England many farmers who quit dairying took up beef farming and to a lesser extend sheep farming.
Judging by the change in land area under arable production, there was not a significant shift into arable farming. In fact the largest reduction
in arable production took place in England.
Milk production in Scotland and Wales has clearly increased whilst production in England has declined and this
diverging situation has steadily got worse in the last 10 years since 2001.
Since a lot more milk is produced in England than in Wales and Scotland, the deteriorating production in England is largely responsible
for the UK decline. Data shown in this report indicates that this difference may not be due to the difference in retail pressure
exerted by supermarkets
in the different countries. Indeed the prices passed down from supermarkets and processors in each country were closely matched between 1996
However the governments
in Scotland and Wales, which became devolved in 1997/98, put
emphasis on rewarding farmers for production than the government in England. This is reflected in the way in which they split subsidy
between production and the
environment. In fact out of the total subsidy received by farmers, spending on environmental measures in England in 2000 was about
60%. This was about double that in Scotland and Wales. Lack of reward for production, and perhaps the more involved paperwork associated
environment-linked subsidy, appears from the data and findings presented in this report to be the main reason why milk production in England,
hence the UK, has declined in the last decade. Since milk production in both Wales and Scotland have both increased and retail pressure in
England and Scotland appears to be evenly matched, the influence on this shift in production of retail pressure from supermarkets appears to be far less than the influence
of how subsidy is based.
Future government policy
James Paice, the Agriculture and Food Minister, said in a parliamentary debate15
in reply to a question regarding fixing a minimum price
for dairy farmers that the English government's role is to
try to make sure
that the market is working properly through ensuring that supermarkets are dissuaded from taking a disproportionate share of the retail price.
Supermarket practices, such as taking a disproportionate share of the price and using milk as a loss-leading product, however should not be special to
England. This is probably happening in Wales
and Scotland as well. As such these practices probably do not explain why production has clearly moved out of England into Wales and Scotland.
Material presented in this
report suggests that different policies of the devolved governments are largely responsible for this shift.
In fact the ability of a dairy farmer to survive and compete is undoubtedly influenced
by the disparity in government policies between that in England and that in Wales and Scotland and no doubt that in France and Ireland.
France is the biggest beneficiary of the Common Agricultural Policy17
and have been strongly opposed to Common Agricultural Policy reform.
Ireland is planning a big increase in milk output if quotas are lifted in 2015. Indeed the Irish government places food at the heart
of an export led growth strategy.18
On the other hand,
the UK Government decided to be one of the first countries in Europe to introduce the Single Payment Scheme and remove the link
between subsidies and production.13
It remains to be seen how
policy in each country will impact on
milk production in the light of proposed CAP reforms17
and the expressed intention16
to remove milk quota altogether.
The UK's strong wish to further substantially reduce subsidy for production is very clearly stated in the reply from DEFRA sent on 16 Feb 2012 in Reference 19. In fact the following is an extract taken from this reply.
The UK wants a very substantial cut to the CAP budget, focused on Pillar 1.
wants a very substantial cut to Pillar 1. Wales, Scotland
and Northern Ireland are not so keen.
Some relevant links
- Monthly UK milk production from 1994 to 2011. Rural Payments Agency.
- UK quota in each county from 1994 to 2003. Rural Payments Agency.
- UK milk production in each county from 2004 to 2011. Rural Payments Agency.
- Numbers of Cattle slaughtered per month by county due to Foot and Mouth in 2001. Defra.
- Cattle numbers.
- The 2001 outbreak of Foot and Mouth disease. House of Commons. Committee of Public Accounts. Fifth Report of Session 2002-03.
- Government delivers another blow to beef and dairy farmers in England. http://www.warmwell.com/04febcap.html
- Report of the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food January 2002
- Net quota shares in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Data received from RPA.
- Actors, Institutions and Attitudes to Rural Development:The UK National Report. December 2000.
- Analysis of recent data on dairy cows in England and implications for the environment. DEFRA. June 2006
- Economic trends in Scottish agriculture. Scottish Government Rural and Environment Analytical Services. 2009.
- Single Payment Scheme. Wikipedia. 2011.
- Dairy facts and figures 2003. Milk Development Council. Published September 2004.
- Video of a parliamentary debate on the future of dairy farming in England. Called by Dr Daniel Poulter. 7th June 2011.
- Milk quota. DairyCo.
- Common Agricultural Policy. Wikipedia. 2011.
- Ireland sees potential for big milk export push. Dairy Reporter. July 2010.
- CAP Reform and Dairy Production. Correspondence with DEFRA in February 2012.
- Calculation of regional UK milk production volume before and after 2004/05. Rural Payments Agency email. 2011.
- Scotland 'on message' on farm subsidies
- An Assessment of the Short to Medium Term Outlook for Global Dairy Markets. Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagas. September 2009.